9-11 Press For Truth

This is one of the LEAST CONSPIRACY-FREAKY, most straightforward, most easily believable of 9/11 documentaries. No 'Illuminati'. This is a documentary by the victims' family members. Features footage from Commission hearings, with critical testimony by Congressman Max Cleland and interaction with other Commission members, former CIA, other public servants.

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969

dilbertgeg (2011-03-09)

Hard time getting this Uled. I sync'd the audio +250ms, should match.

dilbertgeg (2011-03-09)

This documentary mostly sticks to the original story: Binladen did it. We were duped. The Bush White House was incompetent. They blatantly lied to America, and covered up 'mistakes'.
I much prefer info from Ryan Dawson's short videos on YT. He started out somewhat anti-Jew, but he honorably clarified his views later.
more info to follow

dilbertgeg (2011-03-09)

This documentary mostly sticks to the original story: Binladen did it. We were duped. The Bush White House was incompetent. They blatantly lied to America, and covered up 'mistakes'.
The victims' families were upset, of course.
I much prefer info from Ryan Dawson's short videos on YT. He started out somewhat anti-Jew, but he honorably clarified his views later.
more info to follow (for anyone curious)

dilbertgeg (2011-03-09)

PRO-TERROR security specialists in AMERICA
(I can't see these comments appearing just the count)
In the four or five years prior to 9/11, there were at least five remarkable public statements made by three+ elite think-tanks and public relations firms, all of them with deep ties in the government, and with official and unofficial positions authority within the Pentagon, Intelligence, Security. These statements were in writing and/or verbal testimony to the United States Senate Armed Services Cmte.
They PUBLISHED written statements which described the VITAL need FOR a 'catalyzing and catastrophic event', 'a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat', 'a sudden threat or challenge to the publics sense of domestic well-being', 'a renewed threat to American security' which 'would clearly do the trick', 'a clear and present danger', a 'lucky' and 'providential' event like the 'Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor' which would arouse Americans from our 'soothing dreams of permanent neutrality'.

dilbertgeg (2011-03-09)

this will make things a lot easier and this page less bloggy
http://meetog.com/9-11-press-for-truth