TTC - Philosophy of Science

The Teaching Company Philosophy of Science (36 lectures, 30 minutes/lecture) Course No. 4100 Taught by Jeffrey L. Kasser North Carolina State University Ph.D., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor "Science can't be free of philosophy any more than baseball can be free of physics." With this bold intellectual swing for the fences, philosopher Jeffrey L. Kasser launches an ambitious and exciting inquiry into what makes science science, using the tools of philosophy to ask: Why is science so successful? Is there such a thing as the scientific method? How do we distinguish science from pseudoscience? Is science rational, cumulative, and progressive? Focusing his investigation on the vigorous debate over the nature of science that unfolded during the past 100 years, Professor Kasser covers important philosophers such as Karl Popper, W. V. Quine, Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend, Imre Lakatos, Carl Hempel, Nelson Goodman, and Bas van Fraassen. All of these thinkers responded in one way or another to logical positivism, the dominant movement influencing the philosophy of science during the first half of the 20 th century. Logical positivism attempted to ground science exclusively in what could be known through direct experience and logic. It sounds reasonable, but logical positivism proved to be riddled with serious problems, and its eventual demise is an object lesson in how truly difficult it is?perhaps impossible?to secure the logical foundations of a subject that seems so unassailably logical: science. A Surprisingly Practical Field The philosophy of science can be abstract and theoretical, but it is also surprisingly practical. Assumptions about the nature of science affect such contemporary debates as: Which research gets funded What topics qualify as science in elementary and high school classrooms What is considered legitimate and ethical medical care What and whether treatments are reimbursed by insurance companies. Science plays a pivotal role in our society, and a rigorous study of its philosophical foundations sheds light on the ideas, methods, institutions, and habits of mind that have so astonishingly and successfully transformed our world. Philosophy Made Accessible In 36 half-hour lectures, Dr. Kasser takes you step by step through a host of philosophical arguments that illuminate important aspects of science. His goal is "to leave you puzzled in articulate and productive ways"?a mission at which he has compiled an impressive track record, as evidenced by such honors as the prestigious Senior Class Charles Bassett Teaching Award at Colby College. In reporting this award, Colby Magazine cited the following testimonial from a student: "Jeff makes difficult material accessible better than anyone else from whom I've taken a class. After one of Jeff's classes, students feel as though they have conducted a complete study, not just a survey of scattered ideas." Slaying Philosophical Dragons?or Wounding Them? One example of how even the most promising approach to science is beset with unforeseeable problems involves the favorite philosopher of many working scientists: Karl Popper. People from all walks of life are familiar with Popper's rule of thumb for separating pseudoscience from science: If a theory can't be "falsified"?if there is no way to disprove it?then it doesn't qualify as science. Early in the course, you will learn that Popper came up with this formulation in the 1930s in response to his disillusionment with Marxist political theory and Freudian psychology. Neither discipline appeared to have the self-confidence of, for example, Einstein's relativity theory, which could unequivocally state the kinds of observations that would disprove, or falsify, it. By contrast, Marxists and Freudians tended to argue away all apparently disconfirming evidence, rendering their theories immune to falsification. Spurred by this realization, Popper proposed that true science is engaged in a ceaseless attempt, not to prove theories (something that can never be done definitively), but to falsify them, and having done so, to move ahead to improved theories. These, in turn, undergo a new round of tests until falsified, and so on. As you will learn, Popper's demarcation criteria seemed to slay some prominent philosophical dragons, including the notorious problem of induction, first proposed by the Scottish philosopher David Hume in the 18th century. Hume argued that there is no justification for making the inductive inference that the future will resemble the past, which is a linchpin of scientific reasoning. For Popper, this was not a problem because his falsification criteria made no appeal to induction. Professor Kasser quips that Popper is like a mutual fund manager who warns that past performance is not only no guarantee of future performance; it's no evidence at all for future performance. But consider these cases: Contrary to Popper's model, at some point we stop testing our theories and start taking them for granted. Ask yourself how much sense it makes to get on an airplane if you don't think past performance is any indicator at all of future performance. From reading Popper, you might expect that early 19th-century scientists would have been anxious to reject Newtonian physics when the planet Uranus did not have the orbit that Newtonian physics predicted. Instead, they kept Newtonian physics and posited an as-yet-unobserved planet that turned out to be Neptune. Astrology is the poster child of alleged pseudosciences. But advocates of this view often say in one breath that astrology makes false predictions and in another that it's unfalsifiable and hence, unscientific. But making false predictions is just one outcome of making testable ones. You can't simultaneously reject a theory as false and unscientific, especially if your criterion for science is falsifiability. Popper's criteria admit virtually all competitors into the race to survive falsification. But "nobody would watch the Olympics if everybody got to compete," says Professor Kasser. "We have to find some way of distinguishing views that should be taken seriously, that should receive our resources, from views that shouldn't." Popper is not the only thinker to get the philosophical third degree in this manner. If you already hold views about the nature of science or if you simply have strong instincts about what sounds right, you will find your convictions tested repeatedly in this course. Track list: 01 - Science and Philosophy.mp3 02 - Popper and the Problem of Demarcation.mp3 03 - Further Thoughts on Demarcation.mp3 04 - Einstein, Measurement, and Meaning.mp3 05 - Classical Empiricism.mp3 06 - Logical Positivism and Verifiability.mp3 07 - Logical Positivism, Science, and Meaning.mp3 08 - Holism.mp3 09 - Discovery and Justification.mp3 10 - Induction as Illegitimate.mp3 11 - Some Solutions and a New Riddle.mp3 12 - Instances and Consequences.mp3 13 - Kuhn and the Challenge of History.mp3 14 - Revolutions and Rationality.mp3 15 - Assessment of Kuhn.mp3 16 - For and Against Method.mp3 17 - Sociology, Postmodernism, and Science Wars.mp3 18 - (How) Does Science Explain.mp3 19 - Putting the Cause Back in 'Because'.mp3 20 - Probability, Pragmatics, and Unification.mp3 21 - Laws and Regularities.mp3 22 - Laws and Necessity.mp3 23 - Reduction and Progress.mp3 24 - Reduction and Physicalism.mp3 25 - New Views of Meaning and Reference.mp3 26 - Scientific Realism.mp3 27 - Success, Experience, and Explanation.mp3 28 - Realism and Naturalism.mp3 29 - Values and Objectivity.mp3 30 - Probability.mp3 31 - Bayesianism.mp3 32 - Problems with Bayesianism.mp3 33 - Entropy and Explanation.mp3 34 - Species and Reality.mp3 35 - The Elimination of Persons.mp3 36 - Philosophy and Science.mp3 Guidebook included. More related material: http://thepiratebay.se/user/BhangWalla

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969

deconjohn (2007-04-11)

Download with caution!!! This file is being tracked by the MPAA or some similar organization. After downloading this torrent, I received threatening notice from my ISP noting this torrent as the file I was accused of "pirating" download with caution.

KIM JONG IL (2007-04-12)

Well, that just shows you... Anti-Pirates: Against the freedom of knowledge. To hell with'em, and everything they stand for. Good upload.

tekproxy (2008-03-06)

I downloaded this torrent and was not contacted by anyone.
This is AWESOME for long car rides. I keep the CDs in my car at all times and listen to it frequently. Just don't get into an accident while not paying attention to the road.

boris.k (2008-04-12)

Please Seed! Thank You!

jonxjquee (2008-10-14)

i was also notified that this was a copyrighted file cox even shut off my internet until i "removed" them from my computer

jonxjquee (2008-10-14)

so i can't seed this anymore sorry

jonxjquee (2008-10-21)

oh btw peer gaurdian blocks the bad ips from contacting you
i believe they can still notify your isp but peer gaurdian shuts down the torrent so you know it's being watched

IGotDMCA (2010-02-01)

I strongly recommend people not share this. I got a DMCA letter from them. They will enforce protection of their copyrights. Their stuff is high quality but I chose to delete it all after I got the letter.