911 Revisited: Scientific and Ethical Questions by Steven Jones

***Some folks in here have a nasty habit of spamming my posts with false virus warnings, and would eventually, possibly, try to get me banned from this place. I upload A LOT of material about 9/11 being a staged event, and they seem to trigger a lot of those false virus warnings from users named "b2pilot187" and "transcout" (they're probably the same person). Now, he is obviously either a disinformer or simply just the everyday-idiot, because my files are videofiles, hence impossible to infect with a virus. This user has been reported to the admins of this place, so I hope this matter will be setled sooner rather than later. Until then, simply ignore this person. But I would urge anyone not to ignore a virusscan in any event. I suspect he won't even read this, because he simply searches for "911" (and now "Alex Jones" too) and spam each and every post with these warnings. Hence, you will probably find another one below, in the comment section.*** Lecture by Steven E. Jones, Professor of Physics, Brigham Young University, February 1st 2006. Jones has written a paper regarding the September 11 terror attacks which is currently undergoing peer review and pending official publication in scientific journals. The most recent draft is posted on his faculty website at BYU ( http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html ). In this paper, 'Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse', Jones cites evidence supporting the hypothesis that controlled demolition, rather than simply the impact of jet airliners and the ensuing fires, caused the buildings to collapse. In the treatise, Jones presents evidence for the explosive-demolition hypothesis, which has yet to be analyzed in any reports funded by the United States government. Jones notes all three buildings fell symmetrically into their footprints, a phenomenon associated with 'controlled demolition' and examined extensively by 9/11 researcher Jim Hoffman, in calling for renewed investigations into the 9/11 attacks. He points out, among other evidence, the speeds of the collapses, the "pulverization of concrete to flour-like powder," and the presence of horizontal puffs of smoke observed ascending the side of WTC 7, common when pre-positioned explosives are used to demolish buildings. Jones notes that some aspects of the buildings' collapses remain poorly understood and that the demolition hypothesis can quickly resolve much of the debate. A passage in his paper addressing this point: "...How do the upper floors fall so quickly, then, and still conserve momentum in the collapsing buildings? The contradiction is ignored by FEMA, NIST and 9-11 Commission reports where conservation of momentum and the fall times were not analyzed. The paradox is easily resolved by the explosive demolition hypothesis, whereby explosives quickly remove lower-floor material including steel support columns and allow near free-fall-speed collapses (Harris, 2000)...." Jones also examines the official reports by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (aka the 9/11 commission), which all conclude fires and damage alone caused complete demolition of all three buildings. A central topic within Jones essay is the contention that the condition and nature of the debris which remained following the buildings' collapses was not consistent with the scenarios documented by FEMA and NIST; in particular, along with the observations of molten metal at Ground Zero by Leslie Robertson (WTC structural engineer)and Dr. Allison Geyh (a public health investigator from Johns Hopkins), Jones cites and includes photographic evidence, which he says show molten metal in the debris, and notes the reports on sulfidation of structural steel. Note: This is the raw footage from camera 1, and not the final production (will be postet later). But everything is here. Filesize.....: 697 MB Runtime......: 02:13:09 Video Codec..: DivX5 Video Bitrate: ~ 630 kb/s Audio Codec..: MP3 Audio Bitrate: 80 kb/s Frame Size...: 720x576

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969

vper1 (2006-03-18)

Yeehaw, GREAT UPLOAD!
http://www.st911.org
http://www.911blogger.com
bobdaslob: Why do you hate America?

piotrillo (2006-03-18)

Wake up call: Americans love America, and that's pretty much it. Others maybe don't really *hate* it, but close.

Porkster (2006-03-18)

Good work. keep them coming.
Someone should organise a pseudo public 911 court trial and ask important questions. Video tape it all and release onto internet or world tv if they will touch it. Holocaust Theory could be another subject.

katamail (2006-03-18)

oh yea..here we go again .. ReVIsed is back with his nonsense :(

Raziel36 (2006-03-18)

Funny, isn't it? How people will purposely search for these torrents just to tell everyone that it's garbage and not to download it. If they truly believed that, why would they feel the need to do such things?! The fact is that the "facts" of 9/11 are rarely talked about in public forums and even frowned upon in the comfort of your own home. While some of the commentary on these videos can be a little far-fetched and sound like they are addressing children, the facts included can't be dismissed, nor can they be challenged.. they are what they are. Scientists wouldn't go near a camera on this subject if they didn't feel they had important information. Many scientists have said that nothing that happened with the buildings that fell should have been reactions to what happened to them. Fact is, there should still be buildings in those 3 spots.. not horribly attractive after being burned and crashed into, but standing, nontheless. If the nay-sayers would just sit back and watch some of these documentaries, they'd be hardpressed to not be, at least a little, curious about how much our government knew/was involved with what happened that day. Like it or not, some day you'll have to realize that not only did you support one of our worst presidents ever(Hard to call him that, since he was never truly elected, anyhow) but you are also supporting a murderer. I, personally, hope you have a long string of restless nights when you come to terms with the truth.

ReVIsed (2006-03-18)

Australian television interviews some of the remaining 30% who think Bush is doing great:

Notice where they think France, Iran and North Korea is located on a map.

vampire_pirate (2006-03-18)

vampire_pirate (2006-03-18)

When you've finished adjusting your tin foil helmet, don't forget to check out ReVIsed's other great torrents where he tells us that the biggest threat to the world today is in fact the secret conspiracy of Gay Jews who are being supplied with weapons by a pyramid-building alien culture from the other end of a hyperspace corridor to Neptune.
Because this cunt is a homophobe and a racist and a Nazi lover. Don't trust a word the cunt says. It's just a big game to him.

ReVIsed (2006-03-18)

vampire_pirate: You're a lunatic. A raving psycho on steroids man...your anger will probably give you cancer one day.

SweetNucca (2006-03-20)

bobdaslob wrote: "HaHaHa, I love the Bush haters, the more you hate and the more you spread such silly propaganda, the stronger we get." SCREECH go the brakes... Bush and Cheney are at an all time presidential low of 35% in recent popularity polls and even far righters like Norm Coleman are saying the Bush presidencty is incompetent. Kepp up the good work, you guys are doing great :) :) :)

Meadspead (2006-03-22)

Great upload ReVIsed. Very much appreciated here! Nice one, keep'em coming!!

some guy in a cave (2006-08-19)

Sorry xiando, no disrespect meant to your very well written, and highly informed words, but myself, despite all the anger in me caused by this shit, I can?t wish sleepless nights on people who are (for the most part at least) victims of those peoples lies too? If you were never, even for a moment, a victim of those peoples lies too, then you are indeed a very rare member of our species. I know I was a victim of these lies for a long time, and I remember the anguish the revelation caused me. Personally I couldn?t wish that on another victim, regardless that it is inevitable they will put themselves through it.

some guy in a cave (2006-08-19)

As for bobdaslob?. A couple of thoughts especially for you.
Firstly. If - despite all appearances - you actually turn are one of the masses of burger chewing denial monkeys that I addressed previously, then here?s some serious advice for when the realisation hits home. Please, don?t try and explain your actions, just run and hide.

some guy in a cave (2006-08-19)

I?m sorry to say that there?s a witch hunt coming in the wake of what is yet to come - assuming theirs enough of our species left to form a respectably sized angry mob that is - and I?m afraid your remarks on this site are going to be enough for that inquisition to scream complicity at you, and then, if they can find you, you?re fucked

some guy in a cave (2006-08-19)

2) If xiandos claims about you are right, and to be honest, I suspect he/she is spot on, then I wouldn?t rely on any help in your attempts to escape the aforementioned witch hunt. The betrayal of the human race into the clutches of these tyrants that anyone who has watched this film should at least be concerned that they may be doing by denouncing it, would be enough to see even your dear old gran looking at you with hate in her eyes. I?m an atheist, always have been bob, but you know what, I hope I?m wrong. It would be worth the fundamental jolt to my psyche to have it proved to me, beyond any doubt, that hell awaits you and all your kind for what you?ve done and are still trying to do. I don?t believe for a second exists. (RE: burger chewing denial monkeys: a French friends suggestion as to how his countrymen will be getting their own back for the attitude the ficticious mayor quimby summed up so well with his ?cheese eating surrender monkeys? remark).

duhprane (2007-02-19)

bobdaslob is frightened of the civil possibilities acceptance of what many already accept as the truth about 9/11..... civil upheaval, dollar collapse, martial law.... bob, these things are coming anyway whether or not you accept the sad sad truth of 9/11....