J Priestly-Corruption of Christianity.rar

A History of the Corruption of Christianity; in 2 volumes. By: Joseph Priestly. (1871)

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969

laking (2009-03-30)

@tpbsuxx
Please stop with all these nonsense. Jesus did exist and there is a God.
Bro. I am not trying to judge you of your beliefs, but if you' re a person who believe in science, then you will believe the archeologists who have confirmed and provided artifacts proving that Christ did exist.
Bro. I know deep down inside you believe that there is a God you just don't want to accept him, but hope someday you will. Otherwise, why would you make such a big fuzz about something you completely disbelieve?
Lastly, if you read all the teachings of Jesus you will never encounter any that encourages to lie, steal, and above all kill. Christianity did not kill anyone, people who used Christianity's morals and virtues in vain did.

BlackLaval (2009-05-11)

@laking said: f you' re a person who believe in science, then you will believe the archeologists who have confirmed and provided artifacts proving that Christ did exist.
Well, that isn't truth, right now there's no way to prove the historical existence of the main character in the Gospels. The Gospels can't be taken as history books they contain numerous inconsistencies and there are no independt accounts on the deeds or sayings of Jesus. Although, it wouldn't be objective to deny some historical ground on the story of the Gospels, or in other words, you can't prove that 'Jesus' never existed. The consesus among the scholars is to accept that Jesus is a historical figure, but denying the Gospels depicition absolute validity, to them the historical Jesus is not the one in the Scriptures, he's an unknown figure which may be partially reconstructed. Read 'The Search for the Histrocial Jesus' by Albert Schweitzer for an introduction to this problems.
On the other hand, there are some scholars who deny any historical validty to the Gospels, like Robert M. Price, read his 'Christ a fiction?'
Besides you should cite those archeologits, and well even if those finding are true, can an 'artifact' prove the factuality of every word and action in the Gospels? Can it prove his divinity and his Resurrection?
Well, I'd say that's a matter of faith, and faith doesn't prove its contets true, faith is an act of freedom.