Ron Paul, FBI Larken Rose 2007-11-16 Good Violence, Bad Violence

(Use the torrent to download the SHA1-verifiable text AND the excerpt from "How To Be a Successful Tyrant".) ============================================ Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:49:02 -0500 Subject: Good Violence / Bad Violence Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" From: [email protected] /* */ Dear Subscriber, Wow, the fascist apologists in the media, pretending to be conservatives, are shifting into high gear with their statist propaganda. The tyrant-approved message today is one which my book, "How To Be a Successful Tyrant," specifically talks about: the notion that the government is allowed to use violence however it pleases, but it is unforgivable for the peasants to even vaguely suggest forcible resistance. Various state-worshippers such as Glen Beck have decided to paint Ron Paul supporters as terrorists. And it's pretty darn obvious that spreading this lie is a very premeditated, calculated move by the tyrant mouthpieces. The following link will give you a story and videos all about it: [ http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2007/161107_beck_smears.htm ] Please allow me to state the bleeding obvious: Ron Paul is trying to win an ELECTION, and the people who support his campaign are also trying to make that happen. He is trying to use the system to achieve freedom. (I hate to be a party-pooper, but personally, I think that in the long run, that is utterly impossible.) The fact that some of his supporters organized a funding campaign on November 5th--the day Guy Fawkes tried to blow up parliament-- doesn't make them terrorists. But one line from Glen Beck's smear piece made it sound like he's been reading my book. Basically, he acknowledged that the "government" is corrupt, doesn't do what the people want, etc., but followed that up by saying that us peasants are allowed to TALK about that, but only a nasty "terrorist" would ever use VIOLENCE to resist it. (I guess that would include Jefferson, Washington, etc.) What do you think the feds do every DAY? They use violence for EVERYTHING they do. Who made up the rule that it's okay for fascist thugs to use violence, but it's not okay for their victims to forcibly resist them? For example, I believe that when the federal thugs were doing their armed robbery stunt of the Liberty Dollar offices recently, it would have been perfectly justifiable to use whatever amount of force, including deadly force, necessary to repel the thieves. Yes, I'm saying that gunning down the FBI and Secret Service fascists would have been ABSOLUTELY MORALLY JUSTIFIED. Of course, it would also be really dang dangerous, and in the long run I can't imagine it turning out well for those who resisted. So I'm not saying they should have, but I AM saying that they had every right to. Yes, I realize that's an "extremist" viewpoint, which, in a land of obedient pansies, makes most people wet their pants. Too bad. And being someone who DOES believe that forcible resistance to tyranny is a good thing, I am in a position to tell you that that is NOT what the Ron Paul campaign is advocating. Rather than writing it all over again, allow me to quote myself. The following is an excerpt from "How To Be a Successful Tyrant" ( http://www.tyrantbook.com ). Remember, the book is written as if it is addressing aspiring tyrants. Read it, and see how good a job Glen Beck and the other statist apologists are doing following the tyrant blueprint. Sincerely, Larken Rose http://www.larkenrose.com

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969