Why Colleges Breed Communists - The Evolution Hoax Exposed!

A. N. Field First published 1941 excerpts "prominent evolutionist, Professor J. B. S. Haldane, in his book Possible Worlds (p. 38) said in 1927 : "The barrier of inter-specific sterility is the most serious argument against Darwin's Organic Evolution." It is equally a barrier against any other kind of organic evolution." "Nevertheless, there is a small, slight hiatus in the argument. There is, unfortunately for evolutionists, not a shred of evidence of any living thing ever evolving into some different kind of living thing capable of breeding but infertile with its parent stock. All that breeding experiments have produced is mere varieties fertile with their parent stock, or else sterile hybrids, incapable of breeding, such as the mule produced by a cross between horse and donkey. All living things go on obstinately producing young after their own kind and no other kind. Evolution has to show that living things can break through their natural breeding limits. And this is just what evolution has been quite unable to show." "We are more at a loss than ever to understand the causes of evolution. One after another the Buffonian, Lamarckian, Darwinian, Weissmannian, and De Vriesian theories of causation have collapsed ... All that we can say at present is that Nature does not waste time or effort with chance or fortuity or experiment, but that she proceeds directly and creatively to her marvellous adaptative ends of biomechanism" (Nature, September 28, 1931). "Although so heatedly rebuking Huxley in 1862, Darwin himself eight months later, privately admitted in a letter to Dr. Bentham the total absence of any proof of evolution. This is what he wrote under date of May 22, 1863 : "In fact belief in Natural Selection must at present be grounded entirely on general considerations. . . . When we descend to details, we can prove that no one species has changed (i.e., we cannot prove that a single species has changed); nor can we prove that the supposed changes are beneficial, which is the groundwork of the theory. Nor can we explain why some species have changed and others have not" (Darwin's Life and Letters, iii, 25)." "The evidence in the monkey-man case rests on certain fossilised remains. The first of these to appear, consisting of a skull-cap and some fragments, was found in a cave near Dusseldorf shortly before the Origin of Species was published. Numerous other skulls of similar type have since been discovered, and are known as Neanderthal man. The earlier skulls were too incomplete to show the position of the aperture by which the spinal cord entered the brain. It was thus impossible to tell whether Neanderthal man stood upright or not. In conformity with their evolutionist imaginings, scientists for a long time assumed that Neanderthal man was a shaggy, crouching, apelike creature. A reconstruction of him on these lines was made by the eminent Professor Boule, director of the Museum of Natural History in Paris. Similar models appeared in other museums, and pictures were freely published. A few scientists protested, but they were ignored. In 1929 some more complete remains were discovered at Rome the Java skull-top indicates a cranial capacity of about 900 c.c. Here it may be noted that an Australian aboriginal had a 1,250 c.c. brain-case, and a modern European averages around 1,400 c.c. Whoever owned the Java thigh-bone very obviously stood upright, which no ape does. As for the two teeth, they are generally described as ape-like but unusual. Combine the fragments, and the result is a creature standing erect, with chimpanzee brows and no forehead, a human thigh, and with face, feet, body and arms left to be sketched in according to fancy.

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969

sistromo (2008-10-03)

TalmudTimmy, you are obviously ignorant of all things scientific, so here are a few tips. First, scientific theories are never proved. They can only be disproved. Even more, there are scientific theories which we know not to be true, but which are nevertheless used and explored because of their wide applicability and explanatory power - Newtonian mechanics being the best example.
Second, creationism is not a scientific theory because it involves hypothetical supernatural elements, which are beyond the realm of science. If you throw the God from the Bible into the mixture you should also be free to add Odin, the Manitou or even Santa Claus.
Third, creationism is proven, literally every day, to be grossly at odds with physical experiment. In fact, if creationism is true then large chunks of well-established facts in biology, geology, chemistry and physics must be wrong.
Fourth, creationism is based on an origins myth like many, many others, some wildly different, some similar, held by other people world wide. It's just another brand of mythology that its adherents want to impose on everybody.
Fifth, read a few modern books on science to try and see if you can extricate your head out of your stinky hole of bigoted, abject ignorance.
You know what is really sad about you people? It's not that you belief in some unsubstantiated mumbo-jumbo tales that have the same credibility as flicks like the Fantastic Four. What is sad is that you guys claim that faith is all important and then you do not have enough of it to hold your beliefs without resorting to pathetic, ridiculous attempts to cajole and deceive people into thinking that your superstitious trash has any scientific foundation, which if course doesn't.
Not only don't you have the faith, but you also do not have the guts to admit it, and you lack the moral scruples that would keep you from resorting to distortion and lies in an effort to impose your views. Together with moslem fundamentalists (which would agree with you on many more things than you are even aware of) you Christian fundamentalists are one of the most despicable religious groups in existence.

ZiGZ04 (2008-10-04)

1. Fossils
2. DNA
3. Space
4. Earths Age
5. Lost Tribe Of Palau
6. DINOSAURS
"THE WEIGHT OF BELIEF RESTS NOT ON THOSE WHO DISBELIEVE, BUT ON THOSE THAT BELIEVE."
P.S Fuck the bible, Fuck Religion and FUCK you.

InfoWarmonger (2008-10-04)

For once TalmudTimmy uploads something thats accurate.

nofile404 (2008-10-04)

Don't usually jump in stuff like this, Timmy...may I call you Timmy?
But this is just too good, Timmy.
A.N.Field
During the Depression years Arthur Nelson Field was New Zealand's foremost author of conspiracy theories. He wrote a string of publications that attacked orthodox economics, the global banking system, 'creeping bolshevism' and the perceived Jewish world conspiracy. While Field is not widely known today, during the 1930s his books and journals were circulated throughout the English-speaking world by monetary reformists, antisemites and those trying to uncover the causes of the economic crisis.1 In Australia, Field's writings found an avid readership amongst monetary reformers and conspiracy theorists, with a number of propagandists using his writings as 'textbooks' to support their own work.2
With the outbreak of war in September 1939, Field moved away from producing overtly antisemitic books. Nonetheless, he continued writing on a variety of conspiracy topics for the New Zealand Mirror. He also continued publishing, producing Why Colleges Breed Communists in 1941.102 While it avoided the sensitive issue of the world situation and material that could have been deemed Nazi propaganda, Why Colleges Breed Communists was still a full-scale assault on the Jewish-socialist conspiracy that purportedly used the teaching of evolution to undermine morality amongst youth.
With the end of the war the potency of Field's writings declined, although he still enjoyed a strong readership among monetary reformers and antisemites. Queensland Social Crediter H.F. Brus of Nundah, one particularly spirited student of monetary reform, contacted the now elderly Field in 1957, writing with some exaggeration, 'your writings also contributed to bring about the crumbling state of our monetary system. You too helped to put the people wise to its workings'.108 While Brus was more flattering than accurate, Field's contribution to the Australian conspiratorial and antisemitic movements was significant. Field's books, newspapers and private letters all played a part in shaping the Australian radical right.

Footnotes:
1. See M.F. La Rooij, Political Antisemitism During the Great Depression: A Case Study in the Myth of the Jewish World Conspiracy, MA Thesis, Department of History, Victoria University of Wellington, 1998.
2. Throughout this article reference will be made to 'conspiracy theorists' and 'conspiratorial circles'. In both cases these terms are applied loosely to those who believe that the Depression had been created by conscious, unseen forces.
102. A.N. Field, Why Colleges Breed Communists, [The Author], Nelson, 1941, later republished in the United States as The Evolution Hoax Exposed, Pan, Hawthorne CA, 1973.
108. H.F. Brus to Field, 9 May 1957, Field Further Papers, acc 73-148,-1 (6) ATL. Harold Brus was associated with the Social Credit Movement and later became known for his Holocaust revisionism.
A slightly differemt take, eh, Timmy?

]eep (2008-10-04)

Wow! It seems like the science-religion has some avid followers! No sense of humor and afraid of anything that doesn't agree with their axioms hence trying anything to discredit the heretic. Smells like fundamentalists to me...
fossils, rather counter than support Darwinism.
DNA: Mendels gene-thoery blatently disproves Darwinism. Poor Darwin had no clue to the mechanism of procreation of genes.
Space; if anything, shows large anomalies that cannot be explained by science, let alone "evolution theory".
Earth's age. Wow. your feeling lucky. There are several facts that indicate that the earth is largely 5-20 thousand years old (magnetic field, ocean salidity, upright fossilised tree's, coral reefs, expanse of deserts, rate of movement of the Niagara Falls, etc, etc.).
Lost tribe of Palau LOL. Yeah, there's some solid scientific evidence there! :D
Dinosaurs. Ah, you mean extict animals? Like the Coelacanth or what? (oh, that's not extict you say)?
They lived. Point being? That they are descibed in the bible? Or that their footprints have been found with human footprints inside? Or that people still remember them as dragons in folklore (indication, not fact)? Or that most are to large to be sustained by earth's biospere today (like the 1m insects in the 'cambrian'-era)? Guess why that is...
I'm not afraid. I'll read it.

 artpepper (2008-10-05)

Why bother arguing with unteachable pinheads like TalmudTimmy? The poet Heine said it best 200 years ago:
"Against stupidity, the Gods themselves war in vain."
You might as well try to explain Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle to your cat.
These are the cretins who vote for morons like Bush and Palin, you betcha, doggone it...

Frankymydear (2008-10-06)

Sadly you guys are beyond help, so it doesn't really matter what we say.

lodger111 (2008-10-06)

"A typical defeatist tactic. Attack the messenger rather than address the content of the message."
Yes Timmy, one of your favourite tactics, as I recall...

lodger111 (2008-10-07)

Oh, I've brought plenty of content to your torrents, Timmy. I'm always happy to debate the issues. But you're happier calling me a "pedophile", despite a total lack of evidence that this is the case. A little like the unprovable accusations you like to hurl at the Jews, really.
The content of my torrents is completely irrelevant to your irrational hatred of Jews; but while you've got that handy smokescreen, it saves you having to defend your bigotry, doesn't it?

lodger111 (2008-10-09)

I call you an anti-semite because it's self-evident that you ARE an anti-semite. Almost every torrent you post is an anti-semitic document. Are you trying to tell me you're NOT against the Jews?
As for a conspiracy theorist, you are that too. The Israelis being "responsible for 9/11" is a conspiracy theory. Holocaust denial is a conspiracy theory. They fly in the face of established reports (backed up by much fact and documentation) in favour of the opinions of a few people who, to be kind to them, are not exactly experts.
I'm not accusing you of being anything you aren't. I fail to see why you think I am.

lodger111 (2008-10-10)

So by that logic, I suppose six million people just "went missing". And the photographs of the death camps, taken in many cases by the Allied troops who liberated them, were all faked.
If the Holocaust is just a very elaborate hoax, as you claim...then why? Why invent it? Do you have any reason you can give me?

jonxjquee (2008-11-07)

the only arguments against evolution that you have are only arguments in the mind of someone who has no real concept of what evolution is