Conspiracy Theory - Did we land on the moon {mastivalley.com}

Conspiracy Theory - Did we land on the moon {mastivalley.com}

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969

kellypi (2009-01-16)

just started downloading it, but thanks for the upload, i just remembered about this reading a page debunking it. i remember reading a lot about it, so you were there just when i wanted to see it :)
thanks :D

capitanqueso (2009-09-15)

Thanks to all the seeds and specially to the uploader

oracle26 (2010-03-12)

somebody please seed

Moongirl243 (2012-01-27)

Did we really go on the moon ? What do you think ?

RafVne2 (2013-06-03)

@Moongirl243
Personally I still think it was faked. Considering political situation, It was imperative to be "the first" before Russians. And since technologically they have kept failing, idea was born... if you can't do it, fake it.
And just think who was a president at the time...Nixon, probably the biggest crook in US history. :).
I've read all those debunking things, some were reasonable, but some explanations were flimsy at best, and some were not even addressed.
To me the most convincing is... lack of the blast crater underneath, and perfectly clean legs of the LEM, so much dust, and not a single speck of dust on them.
Just my opinion.

RafVne2 (2013-06-03)

And just to clarify, I am not saying they have never landed on the moon, I'm suggesting, that what has been televised as a live feed, was faked.

FrogJacu (2014-10-10)

In answer to "I'm suggesting, that what has been televised as a live feed, was faked" here is a good explanation of the forgetfulness that lets people believe such utter bunk.
LINK DIDN'T WORK! Google 'moon hoax not'!
You have forgotten how bad video technology was, and you don't understand the many layers of proof provided by that very feed. I will assume, for the sake of not being a dick, that this is a lapse in your normally excellent critical thinking, and high intelligence.
For those who can believe such utter rot as this program's claims, such as "There is only one light source on the moon," read the Bad Astronomy page here:
LINK DIDN'T WORK! Google 'bad astronomy' and follow link to 'The Apollo Moon Hoax?'
The moon IS a light source! And the earth was in the sky for all the moon landings. And so on, and so on, and so on.
This program is an hour of junk. If you still want to believe that it was faked, for whatever perverse reasons you have for wanting to believe that, you'll have to do a lot better than this for a source of information. Can viewers really see no problem in claiming that the shadows were wrong for the reasons they cite? Or 'Look at our moon buggy on Earth! It makes billowing clouds of dust, not those obviously faked parabolic arcs like in the Moon footage!" Just how shamelessly stupid an argument will people credit?!
As an image expert I can tell you that if that was a set, it was the roughly the size of Nevada itself, not just Area 51 -- and it was full of a near-perfect vacuum. If you think NASA had such extraordinary technology as that, in 1969, it's strange that you think they couldn't land on the moon for real.
A conspiracy theory is paranoid when you need more and more explanation, and imagination, to validate it in the face of more and more evidence. When every bit of new evidence, rather than confirming your conclusion, makes more work for you, your conclusion is almost certainly wrong. Believing that it was a fake is an uphill struggle, and you only need to see the sheer effort that people put into maintaining the feasibility of their hypotheses, to realise that this is one jab at authority and 'official truth' that simply won't wash. For that I am genuinely sorry, being no fan of authority and official truth myself.
Don't get distracted from real conspiracies, by this childish idiocy. JASOC has more and more power, with no congressional oversight, while you indulge such Alex-Jones-esque and David-Icke-ish FANTASY.
I'm just downloading it for Mitch Pileggi. Not in a gay way :) It's an inexplicable craving. There's not enough Mitch Pileggi in good stuff, so I'm watching him in some total rubbish instead.

FrogJacu (2014-10-10)

This doesn't appear to be seeded, or is hardly ever seeded. It's much quicker to get from a YouTube like site using the downloadhelper plugin for Firefox or Chrome.
Even so, only do so if you love the smell of bullshit :)