Richard Dawkins Philly Lecture 10/22/09

The first 45min of Richard Dawkins' lecture, given at the Philadelphia Free Library on 22 October, 2009.

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969

Tamarind777 (2009-10-27)

Hey, Mr. DUH-kins is back! This time, it's "Richard Dawkins Philly BABBLE." I wonder if he still believes in the flying spaghetti monster?

4lib3rty (2009-10-28)

Dawkins is as religious as those he mocks. Indeed, far more so. If anyone had any doubts that atheism was a religion, they sure won't after listening to this. Whatever happened to just focusing on the science?

Donniedong (2009-10-30)

Any time some promotional joker wants to make a cent off with the religion biz regardless of the belief system or creed, it usually makes for very bad voodoo, karma and usually has a ton of dogma BS added in the mix to divert the attention of the sheep while they are being sheared.

Donniedong (2009-10-30)

Most of the many other "holy books" including the bible, new, old and all the many rewrites and derivatives are just rehashed myths, fables used for propaganda to control the unthinking masses.
Think for YOURSELF. TAX all organized religions for what they are - FOR profit businesses.
That includes the Dawkins poops.

w000ter (2009-10-31)

"Dawkins is as religious as those he mocks." by your reasoning anyone discounting the existence of the tooth fairy is as superstitious as the tooth believer:P its absurd thinking that goes no where.

danb-torrents (2009-11-28)

Thank you for sharing!!

JebusKryst (2010-06-25)

4libery is a braindead cunt

Pastafarian101 (2010-07-06)

"If anyone had any doubts that atheism was a religion, they sure won't after listening to this."
Atheism is not a religion, the same way the believing in a god doesn't necessarily make you religious. For something to become a religion you need tenets, atheists have only one thing in common: non-belief in god, there are no tenets.
"Whatever happened to just focusing on the science?"
Whatever happened to allowing a scientist to use science to test the validity of religion (which is what Dawkins is doing)?
"DAWKINS HAS NEVER DENIED THE EXISTANCE OF GOD. HE HAS ALWAYS SAID THAT HE'S ONLY SIXTY PERCENT SURE THAT GOD DOES NOT EXIST"
I thought it was 99%? Well anyway, on a scale of 1-7 in not believing in the existence of god(s) Dawkins is a 6.9, leaving a slight possibility that there is one, something that all scientists would do.

GaianOrlanthii (2011-04-06)

Jesus Christ, Mohammed, Siddharta and Cthulhu (fthagn! fthagn!) ! - not one of you except danb-torrents thanked Conchaga for uploading this but instead, you all got into a religion war.
How completely typical of this idiot species.
I'm mostly annoyed that this isn't the entire lecture which is my only problem here. (Hey. it's great to be an athiest. You never get a headache over other people's blindly-accepting made-up fantasy stuff.)
Remember to seed and remember that you'll never know who was right or wrong until AFTER you're dead. So quit you're bitching, and be nice to people until then.