A Nightmare On Elm Street HD1080p (Audio: English) (1984)

A Nightmare On Elm Street HD1080p (Audio: English) (1984) Video: Widescreen 1.78:1 Color 1920 X 1080p Audio: ENGLISH: Dolby Digital 5.1 DTS Subtitulos: Espanol English subtitles Svensk text Legenda Português

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969

Vegas68 (2010-06-28)

REAL

Atsaluum (2011-01-10)

This could actually have a slight audio off-sync issues once in a while, like some other comments said before they were removed. I'm not absolutely sure. But I have no problems with numerous others HD movies I have.
The video is High Profile 5.0 10960kbps,
and audio DTS 5.1 1536kbps 48kHz.

Atsaluum (2011-01-10)

I remuxed the mkv with 'no compression' option for the video and audio track in mkvmerge on 'extra options' leaflet. Now it seems to play with no problem. I don't really know how that could've affected it, but it seems to play perfectly in sync now. So, a good release afaik. And kudos for the upper!

keblarman (2011-01-11)

Check your processor consumes as when playing the movie. If it consumes 100% then you processor is the problem. You have to change processors with a higher power.

Atsaluum (2011-01-13)

@keblarman: If you were referring to my posts I don't think this is a matter of prosessing power at all. I'm normally able to play 4-5 high bitrate 1080p video files with my cpu alone flawlessly. Add a 5000-series Radeon to that and it certainly is not an issue of sufficient resources. You have to remember were living a year 2011 and even netbooks are starting to have enough hp to run 1080p.

keblarman (2011-01-18)

Yes i refer to your posts I see no other... look was a suggestion, and all that know me, but NOT EVERYONE has the hardware (I don’t know if you live in the real world 2011). When making a critique must be supported by argument and you did not. You should specify your hardware. Many occasions it could.

Atsaluum (2011-01-19)

If I say that it seems that the video file is suffering from off-sync issues, that clearly includes the argument right there. If not, then I don't how to present one for you besides my visual and cognitive perception of that event.
And after all I did reply to my own posting by saying that remuxing the file with no compression option seemed to fix it for me, as there was a clear difference playing the remuxed file compared to the original concerning the evenly surfacing off-sync issues. And I do remember other people writing off of the off-sync issues as well until the post(s) were removed for some reason. So I can't see the reason why to get all jammed up about my post.
And like I said and I'm saying it again, I appreciate the uploading effort, especially after the release turned out to be alright.