The Politically Incorrect Guide To Science-Tom Bethel (2005) pdf

Editorial Reviews From Publishers Weekly "If the globe is warming, is mankind responsible, or is the sun?" Such a statement does not appear out of place in Bethell's entertaining account of how modern science is politically motivated and in desperate need of oversight. Bethell writes in a compulsively readable style, and although he provides legitimate insight into the potential benefits of nuclear power and hormesis, some readers will be turned off when he attempts to disprove global warming and especially evolution. Throughout the book, Bethell makes questionable claims about subjects as varied as AIDS ("careful U.S. studies had already shown that at least a thousand sexual contacts are needed to achieve heterosexual transmission of the virus") and extinction ("It is not possible definitely to attribute any given extinction to human activity"), and backs up his arguments with references to the music magazine SPIN and thriller-writer Michael Crichton. Ironically, Bethell ends up proving his own premise by producing a highly politicized account of how liberal intellectuals and unchecked government agencies have created a "white-coated priesthood" whose lust for grant money has driven them to produce fearsome (but in Bethell's view, false) tales of ozone destruction and AIDS pandemics. In the end, this book is unlikely to sway readers who aren't already in Bethell's ideological camp, as any points worthy of discussion get lost in the glut of unsourced claims that populate this latest installment of "The Politically Incorrect Guide" series. Book Description Covers subjects spanning evolution, stem cell research, abortion, HIV/AIDS, global warming, and cloning to help you tune up your balony detector to expose the liberal, anti-religious propaganda we're being fed.

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969

surikan (2008-03-16)

creationism spinning propaganda ...

HereWeGoAgain (2008-03-29)

What, surikan, you'd rather have evolutionism propaganda?
I believe the majority of people believe in creation, far more than evolution.

kpatrick17 (2008-05-21)

This reminds me a lot of the eugenics bullshit that white supremacists came out with during the early 20th century to make people believe that science had proven white protestants biologically superior to other races and backgrounds.
I'd like to know who the fuck said that it takes 1,000 heterosexual fucks to transmit HIV. If I were as sick as you bastards I'd wish the virus upon him, so maybe he could see what his garbage has hurt our chances of a cure to.

AlexLibman (2012-08-17)

The Republican Party and the associated cultural institutions in the United States are very far from perfect - they are merely a (much) lesser evil working within a flawed system of mob rule (aka "democracy"). In order to defend themselves from socialist tyranny, the rational political elements, who are invariably in a minority, had to "play politics" and make alliances, including, unfortunately, with religious lunatics. Those people may seem scary at first, but compared to the Democrats they are the paragons of reason and virtue.

Capt_HookFTW (2013-02-05)

Evolutionism does not contradict "creationism". If nature grows in effect of adaptation, what the fuckin answer does it give to the reason of where it came from? Does not explain the damn trigger of life which is the question presented.
Just a little logical reasoning can destroy your limited deities of stupidity. Darwin did not even know DNA, fuckin damn. Neither DNA merely develops itself in effect of accommodation.
Kiss Hitler's ass, godless pagans.