Torrent Hash - Hash of all existing torrents
Please, pay attention to the fact that you are about to download the torrent NOT from torhash.net
torhash.net is just a torrent search engine, no torrents are hosted here.

Secondhand Lions 2003 RERip x264 AC3-WAF

Infohash:

955ED793328DB35660D71F531E5A26A59D4635AF

Type:

Movies

Title:

Secondhand.Lions.2003.RERip.x264.AC3-WAF

Category:

Video/Movies

Uploaded:

2010-03-10 (by sadbawang)

Info:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0327137/

Description:

************************************************************************* Secondhand Lions (2003) ************************************************************************* [RELEASE INFORMATION] REL FILES **** : Secondhand.Lions.2003.RERip.x264.AC3-WAF.mkv (1.37 GiB) SOURCE ******* : Blue_Ray RIPPER ******* : Team_WAF REL DATE ***** : 2010-01-21 RUNTIME ****** : 01:49:09.632 VIDEO INFO *** : x264-core 80 r1376 3feaec2 @ 1,345 Kbps Avg FRAME RATE *** : 23.976 fps RESOLUTION *** : 1024 x 550 (1.862 : 1) AUDIO INFO *** : AC3 3/2.1 CH @ 448 Kbps LANGUAGE ***** : English SUBTITLE ***** : English ************************************************************************* [MOVIE INFORMATION] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0327137/ ************************************************************************* [RELEASE NOTE] N/A *************************************************************************

Files count:

1

Size:

1404.31 Mb

Trackers:

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969

Comments:

Swanee1 (2010-03-10)

Very suspicious. ALl this u/l's torrents are either 2.06 or 1.37 MB. Certainly looks
__@@@@@@@@@@@@___@@@@___________@@@@______@@@@__@@@@@@@@@

__@@@@_______________@@@@@@_________@@@@_____@@@@___@@@@_______

__@@@@______________@@@@@@@________@@@@__@@@@______@@@@________

__@@@@@@@@@____@@@@@@@@________@@@@@@@@________@@@@@@@@

__@@@@____________@@@@____@@@______@@@@@@@@________@@@@________

__@@@@____________@@@@@@@@@@_____@@@@__@@@@______@@@@________

__@@@@__________@@@@_______@@@@___@@@@____@@@@____@@@@________

__@@@@__________@@@@________@@@@__@@@@______@@@@__@@@@@@@@@


Swanee1 (2010-03-10)

I didnt notice that the d/l is a VIP. perhaps the previous comment is incorrect.