Memento 2000 XviD HR 720p Reencode-BalBaiD avi

Memento.2000.XviD.HR.720p.Reencode-BalBaiD ******************************************************************************* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- General Information ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Type.................: Movie Audio Format.........: AC3 Bitrate..............: 384kbps Hz...................: 48,000 Channels.............: 5 channels Video Format.........: AVI Video Bitrate........: 1350 kbps Resolution...........: 960*408 FPS..................: 23.98 Source...............: Memento.BDRip.DTS.5.1.720p.OAR.x264-LsE Original Format......: NTSC Runtime..............: 1:53:26 Language.............: English Genre................: Mystery IMDb Rating..........: 8.6 IMDB URL.............: hxxp://www.imdb.com/title/tt0209144/ File Size............: 1.37GB ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- A first of hopefully, many yet to come. Any feedback is welcome to [email protected] /* */

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969

sweatyrich (2008-05-20)

Dr,
Let's agree that NOBODY ever copies these films to a 700MB CD, right?
So then a few questions:
- Why a file size of 1.37 GB? Most standalone DivX players have a filesize limit of 2GB, so why not use it? Just because of out-of-date "scene" rules?
- Why drop the res down from 1280x544 to 960x408? You need a HDTV (or computer) to play this thing anyway, so why not leave it at 720p?
These are not criticisms, just wondering why?

DrBalbaid (2008-05-20)

I didn't call it a 720p rip. It's a REENCODE of a 720p source. And the reason I did it is because the scene release sucked big time. Also, there was no point in increasing the size, the video won't benefit from it too much.
I thought DivX player could play these things.

sweatyrich (2008-05-20)

Dr,
Standalone DivX players won't play files with a resolution width more than 720x (except the PS3).
Most also don't recognize AC3 audio (again the PS3 is good).
Obviously, playing them on the computer is fine, and everything works.
There's still a big difference between 1280x and 960x. It's comparable to THIS release vs a standard DivX - Though I'm unsure how much bigger the file would be if you kept the original resolution - Probably > 2GB.

DrBalbaid (2008-05-20)

sweatyrich,
Well, yeah. I don't want a >3GB file. If I did, I'd just watch 720p mkv file. This release is to people who wants better quality and close to normal size. Right now I'm trying to reencode Pulp Fiction and I can't fit it into a 1.3GB file. The closest I got is 1.8GB which isn't bad considering the movie is 2:30 hours long.
One more thing, did you watch this file? If so, what's your opinion on the quality compared to the scene release? Because I'm not comparing my encode to a 720p source.

sweatyrich (2008-05-21)

I think if you're gonna rip a HR DivX, then the filesize doesn't have to confirm to the 1.4GB sizing, so long as it's less than 2GB.
I'd MUCH rather d/l a larger HR film than a 700MB/1.4GB film ripped at 640x.
Saying that, I'd always go for a 720p mkv release if available. I'm fortunate to have my LCD TV connected to my computer, so can stream directly from the hard-disk.
I ain't seen the scene release, so can't comment on that, but HOW can you re-encode to HR and STILL compress it to the same size (1.4MB) as a scene release?
Something's gotta give ...?

DolphWulff (2008-05-26)

Either way, this is not highdef. You uploaded to the wrong section. Remove this shit and place it under regular vids.

gullumia (2008-07-20)

I'm not sure of this, but in my mind this is one explanation: 1.4 GB still makes sense without CDs because a DVD perfectly fits 3 movies. At a random size like 2 GB, you are wasting about 300 megs worth of DVD space. Once you burn 5 DVDs, that's adding up to one movie's space. Plus, instead of going for 2 GB, just go for a DVDRip instead of an XviD. :) Lot of older file systems still in use because of portable hard drives (in primitive countries like the US [j/k]) don't support files in GB. So, two 700MB files are ideal for that as well. There you go, 3 run-of-the-mill answers (which may or may not be correct). :) Cheers!

Candy_Man (2009-05-05)

Who's dick do I have to suck to get some seeders. I'm not even seeing a full copy right now. I'll seed for as long as possible for some seeds now.