ZEITGEIST REFUTED

Even secular scholars have rejected the idea of Christianity borrowing from the ancient mysteries. The well-respected Sir Edward Evans-Pritchard writes in Theories of Primitive Religion that "The evidence for this theory is negligible." The first real parallel of a dying and rising god does not appear until A.D. 150, more than a hundred years after the origin of Christianity. So if there was any influence of one on the other, it was the influence of the historical event of the New Testament [resurrection] on mythology, not the reverse. The only known account of a god surviving death that predates Christianity is the Egyptian cult god Osiris. In this myth, Osiris is cut into fourteen pieces, scattered around Egypt, then reassembled and brought back to life by the goddess Isis. However, Osiris does not actually come back to physical life but becomes a member of a shadowy underworld...This is far different than Jesus’ resurrection account where he was the gloriously risen Prince of life who was seen by others on earth before his ascension into heaven." --Dr. Norman Geisler "Not one clear case of any alleged resurrection teaching appears in any pagan text before the late second century A.D., almost one hundred years after the New Testament was written." --Dr. Gary Habermas This film refutes the following claims made in the film Zeitgeist: -Christianity was borrowed from pagan myths? -The Bible was plagiarized? -Jesus wasn't a historical figure? -Christianity was created for social control? -The Bible is based on astrology? MORE INFO VISIT: zeitgeistchallenge.com www.inspiks.com

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80
udp://open.demonii.com:1337
udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969
udp://exodus.desync.com:6969

LokeAs (2009-01-13)

Zeitgeist refutet - well, not by this mess anyways?? lol
The Catholic church "probably" did burn any "pagan" writings [and persons] which were colliding with their arrogant and erroneous worldview...

headlessdonkey (2009-01-13)

The Catholic "Church" is into Satan worship and idolatry, why would they burn their true pagan roots? the Amalgamation of many gods, guise under a Christian flag. I'm certainly not catholic, and I'm not here for arguments. Have a great day/night.

thtrgremlin (2009-01-23)

If you find this evidence compelling, another great site:
Compare the number of users and active discussions going on @ The Flat Earth Society web site compared to Zeitgeist Challenge and compare who has made the better, more comprehensively rational argument for their belief. Personally, I could more easily believe that the perceived direction of the dimensional planes makes it appear that the world is round, but a simple Polar to Cartesian transformation (which is purely perceptual) shows a flat earth supporting all the claims of the Flat Earth Society.
The Bible, just like dinosaur bones, were put here to test our faith, and an attempt to hide the truth.
But it is fun to take on challenges, but why work so hard to win only $250 when you could win $7.5 Trillion just for proving evolution?
Or $100,000 offered to prove global warming
And if Zeitgeist part 2 was true, why wasn't the million dollar reward collected?
All this must prove that Tom Cruz is our true Lord and Savior. Provide any evidence that I am wrong, and I will write your name on a $2 bill, wipe my ass with it, and flush it down the toilet. I have faith it will get to you.

kinggrim (2009-01-23)

I read once that Jesus was actually originally of the Gnostic faith (which, if you look into it, actually follows the teachings of Jesus), but then the Catholic church (which, entertainingly enough, practices very little of the teachings of Jesus), needing a messiah, "stole" him from the Gnostic faith. Another thing that entertains me is that only 4 gospels made it into the bible, when there are, to my knowledge, at least 5 gospels, probably more.